Disclosure – Non-substantive Research
This is not substantive investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. With this commentary, Kepler Partners LLP does not intend to influence your investment firm's behaviour.
Quality as an investing style has outperformed significantly in recent years, and over the past 12 months especially so. After this kind of outperformance, it is natural to ask whether a trend is over-done and profits should be taken – and that is what we have done.
When analysing the typical quality benchmarks, it quickly becomes apparent that these indices have significant industry and sector exposures, which could affect how they perform in the future and put them at risk of a down period. But the picture is also complicated by the fact “quality” is a hard factor to define, making it crucial to understand the investment process of a manager thoroughly.
In our view, there are good reasons to think that quality, properly defined, could continue to do well. In particular, we think that the strong performance of quality in down markets should appeal given the weakening sentiment towards equity markets this summer. However, the issues of index composition and the shifting definition of “quality” means that an active approach is preferable to a passive we argue. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the outlook for quality, and consider a selection of trusts taking varied approaches to achieving a strong quality tilt.
Kepler Trust Intelligence provides research and information for professional and private investors. In order to ensure that we provide you with the right kind of content, and to ensure that the content we provide is compliant, you need to tell us what type of investor you are.Read the full article